A resource for non-professionals interested in aerodynamic theory, testing, and modification of their cars
Related Field: Pipe Organ Voicing
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Perhaps the oldest work in aerodynamics—the study of moving
air—can be found in an unexpected place. Long before wind tunnels and airfoils,
before the Wright brothers and powered flight, airships and streamlined
automobiles, pipe organ voicers figured out how to manipulate airflow to create
a wide variety of sounds.
Detail of the Zliten mosaic (2nd century CE), depicting the playing of several instruments including a hydraulis, the predecessor of the modern pipe organ. (image credit: Wikimedia Commons)
A Brief History The roots of modern organs trace back to ancient Greece,
where an engineer named Ctesibius invented a water-powered organ around 246 BCE
called the hydraulis. This instrument disappeared from western Europe
after the fall of Rome but evolved into the pipe organ in the Eastern Empire and was reintroduced around 800 CE. Since then, organs
have underpinned Western music; the instrument shares its name, organum ("instrument" or "tool"), with the first
polyphony and grew as an accompanimental and solo instrument along with the
development of European music. The organ building industry still thrives today,
with several fine builders operating in the US and Europe.
Paul Fritts & Co. builds historically-inspired mechanical action organs like this one, in Lagerquist Hall at Pacific Lutheran University, Tacoma, WA.
What Does This Have to Do with Aerodynamics? Musical instruments using air movement to create sound
predate the pipe organ by a long time—tens of thousands of years, in fact. The
earliest flutes, some 30,000-40,000 years old, were made out of bone, and when
the hydraulis was invented it produced sound in essentially the same way: air
blown through a tube moves past an open slot where it fluctuates in and out of
the body of the instrument, creating a regular vibration which we hear as a
tone. By the time the organ was re-introduced to Italy in the Middle Ages,
these pipes had evolved. A flat plate called a languid now blocks off
most of the air and forms a slot or flue at the front of the pipe where
a sheet of air is blown out and past an upper lip. Moving the front of
the languid up or down changes the angle of the windsheet, causing the pipe to speak
or not. The art of voicing an organ pipe—for the last thousand years or
more—is really the science of manipulating airflow to produce a desired result.
Pipe mouths, showing the languid sitting behind the flue and lower lip. The pipe in the center of the point is embossed—the pipe metal is scored on the backside before it is rolled up, leaving a visible pattern.
Some of the tools of the organ voicer and car aerodynamicist
are the same. For example, turbulence in the windsheet greatly affects both the
speech of the pipe and its tone color, and voicers discovered as early as the
middle of the 18th century that nicking the front edge of the
languid could reduce this turbulence and improve the speech—but at the expense
of “deadening” the tone by suppressing some of the upper harmonics. Similar to
vortex generators on cars, which are used to reattach flow or eliminate
troublesome wind noise, the nicks help get rid of unwanted turbulence, fluctuations,
or frequencies in the air stream.
These pipes date from the 18th century; the nicking (visible just below the flue) was likely added at a later date. The VG on the right is on a 2018+ Toyota Camry, between the mirror and front window. This is a common location to find VGs on cars.
The fascinating thing about pipe voicing is that most of the
tricks and methods that have been developed over the centuries to manipulate the airflow through pipes were done by
trial and error, long before any sort of aerodynamic theory had been
discovered. Other techniques voicers use to get the right sound include
altering cutup height (how far the windsheet travels before it hits the
upper lip), skiving the upper lip (cutting it at an angle so it
terminates at a sharp edge rather than a blunt one), bowing or flattening the
upper lip, pushing or pulling the lower lip to narrow or widen the flue,
knocking the languid up or down to change the angle of the windsheet, and
carving material or burs out of the sides of the mouth (the opening on
the front of the pipe, between the upper and lower lips), which can reduce
turbulence and/or widen the windsheet. All these actions have to be balanced;
changing one parameter affects many others, as is true in automotive
aerodynamics too. Additionally, the size of the toe hole which admits
air into the pipe, the pipe material and wall thickness, how that material was
cast, the pipe’s shape, its mouth width, its diameter or scale, the wind
pressure and design of the reservoir on which the pipes sit, and the key action
type (electric, pneumatic, or mechanical) all affect the sound. So you can see
that quite a lot of parameters have to be considered when designing and then
voicing an organ! Voicers must be technically skilled, have an excellent ear,
have a good sense of artistry, and be able to voice thousands of pipes in a single
instrument to an exacting degree. This helps explain why there are so few of us
who can do it.
It's not always "all work and no play" though.
Here I am playing the dedication recital for an organ I
helped build in Latrobe, PA. I voiced about half of this instrument, around 1,500
pipes or so:
Buckle up, this one's long. After hanging around Ecomodder for years, I had a pretty messed up idea of the function of spoilers because of what I had read on that forum. You might too. See, the prevailing theory there—based entirely on posts by one forum member who is widely seen as an aerodynamic “guru”—is that spoilers “reach out” to an ideal “template” profile . By so doing, the theory goes on, a “locked vortex” is captured and the airflow above the spoiler follows the “ideal” template line as the air just ahead of the spoiler recirculates. So, simply position a spoiler and extend it until it touches a template profile overlaid on a side-view image of your car and, voil à ! Lower drag—because the spoiler isolates negative pressure in front, higher pressure in the wake behind it, and the outer flow follows the “template” shape. Someone might want to tell this person that the "perfect match" RS spoiler was, according to Burst himself , supposed to be 15 to 20 mm long
Updated September 13, 2023 Tuft testing is an incredibly powerful technique for visualizing airflow. Tuft testing is one of the easiest, cheapest, and most enlightening methods for measuring airflow over your car. Tuft testing is so effective because the behavior of the tufts tells you something about both the characteristics of the boundary layer and the velocity at any spot on your car. Background and Theory To see why tufts are such a great way to test, we first have to look at the paths that air can take over a car and the various ways we have available to visualize them. Aerodynamicists typically use three different illustrations of airflow: pathlines, streaklines, and streamlines (there are more, but we won't get into those here). If we divide the air into tiny “parcels” of constant volume (the technical term is Lagrangian parcels ), the path that a single parcel follows as it moves around and over the car forms a pathline , a record of its movement over a certain elapsed
In my previous post about measuring changes in drag , I discounted coastdown testing as an unreliable method. I called it that because I had tried coastdowns several times and never got usable results. There were several reasons for this that I have been thinking about recently as I search for a method of measuring drag changes on my car. First, I was not good about keeping test parameters consistent; second, the tests themselves were not constructed properly; and third, I was trying to use the test results to calculate things (like drag coefficient) that relied too much on assumptions and were too small to reliably figure from this sort of testing on public roads, which naturally has high variability. I decided to revisit coastdown testing and see if I could design and execute a test in such a way that the results could be trusted and could show me whether the aerodynamic drag of my car has changed. Here's how I did it, and how you can too. Concept The concept behind coast
Comments
Post a Comment